• Users Online: 126
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
   Table of Contents      
CASE REPORT
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 42-45

Extensor tendon injury to the fingers, lack of insight and poor assessment leading to late presentations: A report of 10 case series


1 Consultant Surgeon, Department of Surgery, First Choice Specialist Hospital, Nkpor-Onitsha, Anambra State, Nigeria
2 Medical Officer, Department of Surgery, First Choice Specialist Hospital, Nkpor-Onitsha, Anambra State, Nigeria

Date of Web Publication6-Sep-2017

Correspondence Address:
Thaddeus Chika Agu
Consultant Surgeon, First Choice Specialist Hospital, Nkpor-Onitsha, Anambra State
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/NJGP.NJGP_12_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


The subcutaneous position of the extensor tendons makes it possible for the tendon/s to be lacerated in many cases of sharp object cuts on the dorsum of hand. The lack of insight and the poor patients' assessment cause the primary clinician to secure hemostasis and repair the obvious skin wound only. This unrecognized tendon injury would later become obvious because of persistent deformity and loss of function. This is a case series of patients with delayed diagnosis of extensor tendon injuries to the fingers as seen in a level II surgical specialty from January 2006 to December 2016.These extensor tendon injuries presented late after healing of skin wounds. Tenolysis, tenorrhaphy and physiotherapy were successful but the delay caused loss of man hours and added cost to treatment.

Keywords: Extensor tendon, finger injury, late presentation, poor assessment, tenorrhaphy


How to cite this article:
Agu TC, Akuka LU. Extensor tendon injury to the fingers, lack of insight and poor assessment leading to late presentations: A report of 10 case series. Niger J Gen Pract 2017;15:42-5

How to cite this URL:
Agu TC, Akuka LU. Extensor tendon injury to the fingers, lack of insight and poor assessment leading to late presentations: A report of 10 case series. Niger J Gen Pract [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Nov 18];15:42-5. Available from: http://www.njgp.org/text.asp?2017/15/2/42/214109




  Introduction Top


Sharp cuts from falling glass louvers, smashed bottle edges, knife stabbing, machete and rotating fan blades, human bites, and finger jamming are associated with extensor tendon injuries of the hand.[1] The high energy of impact necessarily would lacerate the thin skin as well as the underlying structures, especially the extensor tendons which are anatomically superficial.[2] Neglecting this basic anatomy and the pathomechanics of sharp cuts to the dorsum of the hand often leads to inadequate clinical assessment by the primary clinician. Securing hemostasis and suturing the skin wound apparently allayed the apprehension of the patients and momentarily satisfied the clinician. Re-presentation of patients after wound healing, because of persistent deformity and the inability to extend the finger/s, may raise the red flag with respect to the initial unrecognized tendon/s injury.

Associated fractures in such hand injuries may easily be recognized but should be confirmed by radiographs, especially as it could just be a tiny pulled bone such as in mallet finger.[3] Conversely, the inability to extend the fingers at first presentation could be mistakenly attributed to pain and apprehension. This misdiagnosis is also common when the patients are assessed under general anesthesia, as active finger movements are necessary to clinically diagnose tendon injuries. Also important is the ability of the patient to move the fingers on request while the repair is going on like in the acclaimed awake tendon repair with local anesthetics,[4],[5] so as to determine the adequacy of repair and establish early gliding of the tendon. However being conscious of this injury and carrying out a proper clinical assessment would lead to correct diagnosis and correct treatment and thus prevent the problems associated with late repair.

The literatures recognizing this entity are numerous, but none highlights this peculiarity in our environment. This case series outlines the need for accurate clinical assessment at first presentation and emphasizes the importance of primary tendon repair to avoid deformity and hasten return to normal functions.


  Case Presentation Top


One of the patients was a 42-year-old lady who was stabbed with a broken bottle on her left hand following an altercation with a neighbor. She was rushed to a general practitioner who secured the hemostasis and repaired the skin wound. The wound healed few days later, but in the following ten weeks, she noticed persistent deformity of her index finger and inability to extend it. It was in this condition that she came to us [Figure 1]. Examination confirmed that her index finger was held in a flexed position, the bones and joints were normal, and she could not extend the finger actively. Other fingers were normal and function of the hand was reasonably satisfactory in this right-handed patient. We carried out a tendon repair under general anesthesia and proximal tourniquet with an extended vertical incision along the index finger. The retracted proximal end of tendon was identified, adhesions were released, and the tendon was elongated by Z-plasty, so that it could reach the distal end for repair with polyethylene 2/0 [Figure 2]. A cast was applied with the fingers in extension for 4 weeks to avoid tension on the repair until healed. Active and passive range of motion exercises were commenced with a good result at 8 weeks post operation [Figure 3].
Figure 1: Clinical photograph showing deformity and inability to extend the index finger

Click here to view
Figure 2: Intra-operative photograph showing tenolysis and repair

Click here to view
Figure 3: Eight weeks post-operation, extension of finger restored

Click here to view


A similar presentation was a 17-year-old undergraduate female student whose dominant right hand accidentally got cut by a rotating ceiling fan blade in her school hostel. A medical officer in the university health center saw her and secured the hemostasis and sutured her wound. At the end of 3 weeks, she noticed persistent deformity and the inability to extend her ring and little fingers. Examination revealed an indurated, healed wound on the dorsum of the hand with the right little and ring fingers held in a flexed position. There was loss of active extension in these two fingers, whereas the other fingers extended normally [Figure 4]. Tenorrhaphy was carried out through a single extended incision on the lateral aspect of the dorsum of the hand. The retracted tendons were pulled down after freeing them from fibrous adhesions, and end-to-end repair with nylon 2/0 was done. The fingers were splinted in extension for 4 weeks, and physiotherapy was commenced thereafter with satisfactory results [Table 1].
Figure 4: Clinical photo of right hand extensor tendon injury to IV and V fingers showing deformity and inability to extend the two fingers

Click here to view
Table 1: Below shows distribution of the patients with late presentation of extensor tendon injuries of the fingers according to age, gender, sidedness, etiology, pattern of presentation and outcome

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Extensor tendon injury of the hand is common with sharp objects cutting the dorsum of the hand either by accident or by assault.[1] Injuries from falling glass louvers are less common now because buildings nowdays have windows made with aluminum frames and glass and are often fabricated in sliding patterns. On the other hand, assault with machete and broken bottle stabs are still observed as causes of hand injury in the past and recent times, suggesting that violence and lawlessness are still prevalent in our society. Extensor tendon injury is a recognized defensive blockage injury,[1] which the patient sustains while protecting the face or head from the injury as the assailant strikes with the sharp object. This type of injury is more likely to affect the dominant hand as seen in this case series unlike the falling glass louver that could affect either of the hands or even the flexor tendons at the wrist, depending on the position of the hand at the time of injury. Nevertheless, extensor tendon injuries of the hand are more common than flexor injuries.[6]

If the extensor tendons to the fingers when injured are timely recognized as they should be, primary repair is likely to give a better result than delayed repair in terms of period of rehabilitation,[7] cost of treatment, and the patient's eventual satisfaction. The recognition of extensor tendon injuries at the time of initial assessment is aided by good knowledge of the anatomy and functions of the extensor tendons. Although the extensor tendons to the fingers act independently, the extensor expansion sends fibrous twigs to the different tendons, and therefore, the movement of adjoining fingers in extension is observed as any one finger is being actively moved. It is important to discern this trick movement caused by juncturae tendinum between the communis tendons as the clinician examines the extension of each finger following hand injury.[8] The intrinsic muscles like the lumbricals also extend the fingers, and this fact should be kept in mind during the assessment.[8] The anatomic zones according to Kleinert and Verdan[9] also help the clinician determine the treatment option. It is known that injuries in the odd zones, across the joints, and the more proximal zones VII and VIII have peculiar treatment modalities than repair on the dorsum, zone VI.[3] Most of our patients fell under zone VI, in which the repair is more straightforward. Treatment is also influenced by the cause of injury. Injuries from contaminated objects such as farm machetes or human bites would require debridement, delaying repair for up to seven days.[10] The degree of injury also determines which surgeon does the repair and whether the repair should be in the accident and emergency or operating theater with the full complimentary apparatus, including a good lighting source and a surgical expert.[11],[12]

Adequate preoperative assessment of the hand, if possible, should be done so that the plan for primary tendon repair or the option of referral could be undertaken early. Because of pain and apprehension, this initial assessment is better done under adequate analgesia, so that the patient will obey the command of actively extending the fingers as a group and then individually. Sensation could also be assessed on a patient who is awake. Cases in which this is not possible, on-table assessment under anesthesia should be carried out with a high index of suspicion of tendon injury. It is better to assume a tendon injury and thoroughly look out for it once there is a skin laceration following a sharp cut to the dorsum of the hand until proven otherwise. If the diagnosis is made and the proximal end is retracted from the wound, a vertical incision could be extended from a horizontal wound to create a hybrid 'L' or 'T' wound. Furthermore, tendon retraction at the time of initial presentation is usually small as compared to when the patient presents late. Retraction after tendon cut is worse with flexor tendons, and this could mean more extensive proximal exploration. The distal end of the torn tendon on the other hand is often located very close to the wound irrespective of the time of presentation.[13] The extensor tendon repairs need tact to avoid adhesions and scarring especially as they are thinner, flatter, and lack tendon sheaths and also lie very close to the bones and joint in comparison with the flexor tendons.[14] These adhesions with associated stiffness impair function and dynamic splint is needed, when possible, to enhance early movement.[15] We used static plaster of Paris splints in extension to avoid undue tension on the repairs for at least four weeks before physiotherapy.

There is a cursory proportionate relationship between the time of initial injury to the time of delayed repair and the duration it takes for full recovery after physiotherapy [Table 1]. Other factors like patient's motivation play a major role with compliance to physiotherapy and thus eventual recovery, but putting this factor aside, it is clear from this case series that the shorter the duration of presentation and repair, the shorter the period of rehabilitation before full recovery. This could be extrapolated to mean a quicker return to activities of daily living and less cost of treatment. However, a significant statistical inference cannot be made because of the small number of patients.


  Conclusion Top


Inadequate assessment of injuries on the extensor surface of the hand often leads to unrecognized extensor tendon laceration, which would present later as deformity and loss of function. The tip-and-trick is to assume extensor tendon injuries once there is a skin laceration following a sharp object cut to the dorsum of the hand until proven otherwise. This high concern would increase the early diagnostic yield and thus, forestall the problems associated with delayed diagnosis and repair.

Consent

The ethical committee of First Choice Specialist Hospital approved this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

The first author conceptualized the study and self-sponsored it while the second author collected and collated the data.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Griffin M, Hindocha S, Jordan D, Saleh M, Khan W. Management of extensor tendon injuries. Open Orthop J 2012;6:36-42.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Hague MF. The results of tendon suture of the hand: A review of 500 patient. Acta Orthop Scand 1954;24:258.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Matzon JL, Bozentka DJ. Extensor tendon injuries. J Hand Surg 2010;35A:854-61.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Lalonde DH, Martin AC. Wide awake flexor tendon repair and early tendon mobilization in zones 1 and 2. J Hand Clin 2013;29:207-13. doi: 10.1016/j, hcl.2013.02.009.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Tang JB. Wide awake primary flexor tendon repair, tenolysis and tendon transfer. Clin Orthop Surg 2015;7:275-81.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Tuncali D, Yavuz N, Terzioglu A, Aslan G. The rate of upper extremity deep structure injury through small penetrating laceration. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:146-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Newport ML, Tucker RL. New perspectives on extensor tendon repair and implications for rehabilitation. J Hand Ther 2005;18:175-81.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Calabro JJ, Hoidal CR, Susini LM. Extensor tendon repair in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 1986;4:217-25.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Kleinert HE, Verdan C. Report of the committee on tendon injuries International Federation of Societies for surgery of the hand. J Hand Surg Am 1983;8:794-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Hart RG, Uehara DT, Wagner MJ. Emergency and Primary Care of the Hand. American College of Emergency Physicians; ACEP: United states; 2001. p. 175-88.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Altobeth GG, Conneely S, Haufler C, Walsh M, Ruchelsman DE. Outcomes of digital zone IV and V and thumb zone TI to TIV extensor tendon repairs using a running interlocking horizontal mattress technique. J Hand Surg Am 2013;38:1079-83.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Feuvrier D, Loisel F, Pauchot J, Obert L. Emergency repair of extensor tendon central slip defects with Oberlins bypass technique: Feasibility and results in 4 cases with more than 5 years follow-up. Chir Main 2014;33:315-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.
Hanz KR, Saint-Cyr M, Semmler MJ, Rohrich RJ. Extensor tendon injuries: Acute management and secondary reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:109-20.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Magerle K, German G. Extensor tendon injuries. In: Neligan PC, editor. Plastic Surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2013. p. 210-27.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Neuhaus V, Wong G, Russo KE, Mudgal CS. Dynamic splinting with early motion following zone IV/V and TI to TIII extensor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am 2012;37:933-71.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case Presentation
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed167    
    Printed15    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded24    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal